| continued from How to STOP the IRS The change continued in 2007, after the Supreme Court decided that “failure to plead exhaustion” in the complaint was not, in and of itself, a basis for dismissal unless the statute said so in express terms. This resulted in one D.C. district judge reinstating a number of cases he had dismissed for that very reason (one of which he’d dismissed 18 months before). Meanwhile, the Plaintiffs – all individuals bringing their own cases – had been arguing that the regulation at issue was of a type that could only be applied to IRS, and not to Citizens seeking redress. Although too technical to describe at length here, the gist of the issue is that there are 2 types of federal regulations: “substantive” (or “legislative”), and “interpretative” (or “procedural”). The former “have the force and effect of law”, and the latter do not. The Plaintiffs argued that the regulation at issue was of the latter type. Predictably, the government disagreed, and, as predictably, the district court sided with the government. continued below Based on more than 30,000 hours of personal research into the research of countless predecessors, this interactive CD-ROM trains you, the free-thinking Citizen, through hyperlinks, on the effective use of all 12 Acts of Congress, the Internal Revenue Code, and all applicable regulations, to require IRS to produce evidence that all requirements of all laws and all regulations were met to protect your rights and Liberties.
Learn to be FREE!
| |
